education / 学校 [學校] / учи́ть / Bildung

The Commercial Credit Circuit (C3) is a business-to-business system that is an improvement on the WIR, in the sense that the currency is convertible on demand into national currency. It is a powerful way to create employment because it injects working capital in networks of small and medium sized enterprises (SME), thereby creating employment (because SMEs tend to be the sector that provides 90% of all private employment. This system is currently operational in Brazil and in Uruguay with several other Latin American countries interested in implementing it. For an executive summary of this system, please read below:

http://www.lietaer.com/2011/09/commercial-credit-circuit-c3/

What is C3 in Uruguay?

C3 (Circuit of Trade Credit) is a tool for the Micro, Small and Medium-sized enterprises (Msmes) access to credit and to make electronic payments to public and private companies that are part of the network of commercial transactions.

All the rights that are transferred through Network are 100% guaranteed by the CND (Corporación Nacional para el Desarrollo) and the BROU (Bank of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay).

It operates through 3 channels:

Internet, cell phone and a magnetic card.

What is a network of business transactions?

Connects supply and demand, creditors and debtors.

Transferred rights electronically, without the use of money physical.

As a means of payment are used transferable rights, in uruguayan pesos or us dollars.

The transactions are “payments and collections”, the “debits and credits” among the participants of the Network.

100% transparency: systematic recording and automatic movements.

Commercial Credit Circuit (C3)A Financial Innovation to Structurally Address Unemployment

by Bernard Lietaer(blietaer@earthlink.net and www.lietaer.com) in collaboration with STRO(www.strohalm.nl).
What started as a banking and financial crisis in 2008, is now rapidly becoming a major job crisis.
It is also a well-known fact that the vast majority of jobs are provided by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs).
And the survival of many such firms is now increasingly atrisk because of cash flow problems.
The Problem SMEs’ are being pressured by suppliers for prompt payments, say within 30 days; while their larger customers pay them only in 90 or more days. This becomes a deadly cash flow trap whenever banks refuse to provide bridge financing, or do so at steep conditions. This problem has become more critical recently in developed countries under the impact of the financial crisis, but it has long been an endemic issue in developing countries.
The Solution The “Social Trade Organisation” (STRO), a Dutch Research and Development NGO, has successfully developed business-models over the past decade in several Latin American countries which culminated with a financial innovation that structurally addresses this precise challenge.
The process uses insured invoices
or other payment claims
as liquid payment instruments within a business to business clearing-network.
Each recipient of such an instrument has the choice to either cash it in national money (at a cost), or directly pay its own suppliers with the proceeds of the insured invoice.
How this is achieved is described next.

C3 Step by Step:

The C3 mechanism involves the following six steps:
  1. Participating businesses start by securing an invoice insurance up to a predetermined amount, based on the specific creditworthiness of their own business and of the claims they obtain on third parties.
  2. The business that has obtained such an insurance (hereafter referred to as business A)opens a checking account in the clearing-network, electronically exchanges the insured invoice for clearing funds, and pays its supplier (business B) immediately and fully with those clearing funds via the clearing network.
  3. To receive its payment, business B only needs to open its own checking account in the network. Business B has now two options: either cashing it in for conventional national money (at the cost of paying the interest for the outstanding period, e.g. 90 days; plus banking fees); or pay its own suppliers with the corresponding clearing funds (at no cost).
  4. Whatever the timing of the payment is to business A, business B is in a position to use the positive balance on its account in the network, for instance to pay its supplier business C.
  5. Business C only needs to open an account in the network. It has then the same two options as business B: cash it in for national money, or spend it in the network. And so on…
  6. 6. At maturity of the invoice, the network gets paid the amount of the invoice in national money, either by business A or by the insurance company (in case of default of business A). Whoever owns at that point the proceeds of the insured invoice can cash them in for national money without incurring any interest costs.

Benefits For businesses:

Businesses increase their access to short-term credit as needed to improve their working capital and the use of their productive capacity. The size of this credit can be built up to a stable level between a quarter (covering therefore up to an average of 90 days of invoices)and half of annual sales; at a cost substantially lower than what is otherwise possible.
 
Suppliers are paid immediately, regardless of the payment schedule of the original buyer,injecting substantial liquidity at very low cost in the entire SMEs network. The approach provides a viral spreading of participation to the C3 networks from clients to suppliers.
 
The technology is a proven one, doesn’t require any new legislation or government approvals, and the necessary software is available in open source.
 
Only invoices that are100% guaranteed, and 100% computerized, are acceptable in a C3 system. C3 there by encourages the generalization and more efficient use of IT infrastructure among SMEs, including the opening of new markets and marketing channels through e-commerce.For
governments, particularly regional governments:
Notice that the most effective way for governments at any level to encourage the implementation of the C3 strategy is for them to accept payment of taxes and fees in the C3currency. This encourages everybody to accept the C3 currency in payment, and provides additional income to the government from transactions that otherwise wouldn’t take place.
Furthermore, that additional income becomes automatically available in conventional national currency at the latest 90 days after the payment, thereby not upsetting any existing procurement policies. The first country that has followed this strategy is Uruguay. The other advantages to governmental entities are:
 
The C3 approach is a dependable way to systemically reduce unemployment.Governments at different levels (EU, national, regional) can contribute to a joint guarantee mechanism.
Such a guarantee mechanism is considerably cheaper to fund than subsidies or other traditional approaches to reduce unemployment.
 
C3 helps shift economic activities from the black or grey economy into the official economy, because SMEs need to be formally incorporated to participate, and all exchanges are electronic and therefore traceable.
 
C3 systems are best organized at a regional level, so that each network remains at a manageable scale. Businesses with an account in the same regional network have an incentive to spend their balances with each other, and thus further stimulate the regional economy. C3 provides a win-win environment for all participants, and therefore promote sother collaborative activities among regional businesses.
 
Each C3 network should use the same insurance standards and a compatible software so that they can interconnect as a network of networks to facilitate exchanges internationally For banks and the financial system.
 
The win-win approach of C3 includes also the financial system. As the entire C3 process is computerized, it significantly streamlines the lending and management for the insurance and loan providers.
SMEs can therefore become a more profitable sector for banks,because the credit lines are negotiated with the entire clearing network, providing the financial sector with automatic risk diversification among the participants in the network.
In the upcoming surge of new competitors in the market – such as Facebook, Google or Tesco
 
Open Source means that the source code of the software is publicly available, making it possible for users to adapt the system to their own requirements.
 
Specific parts of the C3 methodology are protected by a patent, but the conditions to get user license are transparency and monitoring procedures to guarantee fair treatment of the network participants, as well as a small contribution to fund the spreading of such systems. This generates the benefit of additional spending opportunities for any C3 network. More information via c3@socialtrade.org 

Links and Tweets:

for some reason Mr Lietaer seems to have become quiet quiet on Twitter and his website…

https://feeds.feedburner.com/CurrencySolutions

http://www.lietaer.com/comments/feed/

https://twitter.com/search?q=lietaer

src: http://www.themonetaryreset.com/2014/08/how-they-got-us-into-this-mess-solution.html?m=1

Let me be clear – i support a bigger bio-diversity of cooperation tools. That is why this website is called alt-coop-sys – alternative – cooperation – systems.

And therefore it is good to have alternatives to do your payments – no matter if its potatoes – bretzls or bits and bytes.

What i dislike is the “one tool does it all” thinking – which completely fails the needs of the people.

What is great about bitcoins?

  • relative (price) stability
    • no inflation – reproduction is not infinite – not a fiat currency – can not be just printed
    • if exchange gets hacked – prices are down
  • 100% open source and digital
    • works international
    • can just as the internet itself not be fully controlled by a single bank or government
      • but well lawmakers can make laws – like that in NY you will need a license from the state to sell bitcoins against USD.

What is bad about bitcoins?

Even if BitCoins is not a fake-grassroots movement ( i don’t think it is ) – the concept could be copied by banks – which of course will then NOT be open source – that would be probably the time when open source BitCoin will get banned by (bank-lobby made) law for some fake reason like terrorism or money-laundering. (as if that was not possible with todays bank money)

If you want to fight terrorism – don’t trade with them! 😀 don’t supply them with arms and ammunition.

But well – what would the Industrial-Military-Finance-Complex do – without some phony external threat or war? Make less profit i guess.

It is not so important who Satoshi Nakamoto really is 😀

Code is creating facts.

are world currencies a good/bad idea?

As you can read here – “Te absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment” (1988).

Well look at Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy now that they have the Euro:

  • debt so high they can not possibly repay
  • economy worse than ever
  • unemployment higher than ever

So this hope needs to be put into the category – illusion or deliberate deception of policy makers and the masses by some more-clever elite with a secret agenda.

How can you install a world currency? Only digital.

The “Problem” is not BitCoin – The Problem is NWO taking the BlockChain technology – and creating a centralized version of that then burning down all cash money to the value of zero and then using this new cool technology for world government. (Illuminati Credo: Ordo Ab Chao – Order out of Chaos

It will (probably) be their own implementation of the BlockChain-technology in a centralized way, not the actual OpenSource BitCoin software everyone can run and install.

Mr Stiglitz Davos 2017: USA get rid of all cash

“India was the ‘test case’ for gong cashless, and it was so successful that the United States is next in the crosshairs. This isn’t about staving off corruption, but rather implementing Technocray.  TN Editor”

src: https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/01/18/joseph-stiglitz-us-dump-cash-move-digital-currency/

“That’s because the most notorious terrorist group on the planet famously uses both the world’s oldest currency (gold) and the world’s newest currency (Bitcoin).

Professor Stiglitz has likely never been anywhere near a terrorist, so he likely doesn’t have a clue how they conduct financial transactions.

Stiglitz also relies on the old claim that cash facilitates illicit activity.

Again, this thinking only highlights a Dark Ages mentality.

In the today’s world, drug dealers and prostitutes accept credit cards.”

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-19/nobel-prize-winner-tells-davos-elite-us-should-get-rid-currency

“This is where Kimball’s idea for an electronic currency comes in. However, unlike Bitcoin, which prides itself on its decentralization and anonymity, Kimball’s digital currency would be centralized and widely used. He would effectively set up two different types of currencies: dollars and e-dollars.”

Mt.Gox was hacked in 2013 and BitCoins stolen… that’s why the prices dropped.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mt._Gox#2013

Is Mr Assange taken for a ride by anonymous “Satoshi Nakamoto“?