Finanzkriminalität / Financial Crime

French Ex President Sarkozy accepted about 50 Mio USD from Libya’s (killed 2011 by rebel groups) dictator Gaddafi as “friendship gift” which he spend in the 2007 election campaign to win presidency by 53.1%.

Of course General Gaddafi ruled Libya with a iron fist and now another General tries to take power and brought war back to Libya.

General Haftar Attack of Tripoli escalates civil war in splintered Libya

04/11/2019  By Bob Tippee

New York Times: blocks proposed draft statement calling for halt to Libyan National Army offensive around . EU will now attempt to draft new statement.

The French oil company TOTAL is operating in Libya

and Gaddafi’s removal was very much in their interest.

When insurgents surged (maybe started by US CIA and  backed by the US) France stepped in with it’s Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier to drop even more bombs on Gaddafi – for the single purpose to directly extract the oil from the ground without a middleman.

March 2, 2018 / 8:30 AM:

Oil major TOTAL expands in Libya, buys U.S. Marathon‘s Waha stake for $450 million

The sideffects of this greedy tactic: the refugee crisis of 2015

which swept accross europe and the resulting boost for right-wing parties accross europe. (Poland is strictly Catholic, while massively profiting from EU investments, did not accept ANY refugees)

While Sarkozy is himself a centre-right politician – so i guess it is the old game: greedy eats brains.

Macron will probably be the last elected president of France, Le Pen will kill democracy in France – Sarkozy and TOTAL are to blame.

Just look at this horrible video from calais and you know why – 30.000 migrants try to cross over from France to UK, but are stuck in France for years.

Merkel ‘Fed up With Erdogan Blackmailing Germany’ With Refugee Deal

Mrs Merkel had to bribe Erdogan to keep the refugees in his country.

The people that flee are mostly – young male black that steal and rape.

And the European governments just don’t know what to do.

“GOOD JOB” all involved.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, on the situation in Libya, is a measure that was adopted on 17 March 2011. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom.[1][2]

Hillary Clinton argued that, though arming anti-Gaddafi forces was not being proposed at the time, it would be legal to do so.[5]

(src: Wikipedia)

it seems NATO and was involved, Canadian Lt. Gen Charles Bouchard, WTF!? SERIOUSLY!


Canada, want some refugees?

Military intervention in Libya began on 19 March, as fighter jets of the French Air Force destroyed several pro-Gaddafi vehicles advancing on rebel stronghold Benghazi. U.S. and British submarines then fired over 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets throughout Libya, severely disabling the regime’s air defense capability and allowing a wider enforcement of the no-fly zone to begin. A coalition of 10 states from Europe and the Middle East initially participated in the intervention, later expanding to 17. On 31 March, NATO assumed command of the operation. The intervention succeeded in preventing pro-Gaddafi forces from capturing Benghazi.[16]

On 24 August, it was acknowledged for the first time that special forces troops from Britain,[17] Italy, France, Jordan, Qatar,[18] and the UAE[18] had intervened on the ground in Libyan territory, stepping up operations in Tripoli and other cities.[19] This has been questioned as a possible violation of Resolution 1973[20] although the use of special forces is not prohibited by the resolution.

Noam Chomsky has argued that the Western military intervention into Libya was a clear breach of UNSCR 1973 since it nullified the attempts for a ceasefire that were put forward by the resolution and welcomed by Gaddafi. As he puts it, “NATO powers (France and Britain in the lead and the United States following) violated the resolution, radically, and became the air force of the rebels. Nothing in the resolution justified that. It did call for “all necessary steps” to protect civilians, but there’s a big difference between protecting civilians and being the air force for the rebels.” [21]

(src: wikipedia)

IT IS SICKENING and might even result in many Hitlers 2.0 coming to power all across Europe

All for a little oil.


“Businessman Ziad Takiéddine arrives at the anti-corruption police office in Nanterre, France, on November 17, 2016, for a hearing after admitting

he delivered three cash-stuffed suitcases from Libya’s Moammar Gaddafi to former French President Nicolas Sarkozy”


About Sarkozy:

He won the French presidential election, 2007 by a 53.1% to 46.9% margin to Socialist Ségolène Royal. During his term, he faced the late-2000s financial crisis (causing a recession and the European sovereign debt crisis) and the Arab Spring (especially in Tunisia, Libya, and Syria). He initiated the reform of French universities (2007) and the pension reform (2010).

He was the leader of the Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) party from 2004 to 2007.



Greenwald: New York Times aka the mainstream media welcomes Assange’s arrest


and it seems it is exactly what was about to come in 2019 for Assange.

it shows two things:

The only place for western whistle blowers to be safe – is and remains Russia

If this legislative situation does not improve (and it does not look like it) speaking out against crimes – in the democratic west – will get you in serious trouble – even when law is on your side – just as if you would speak out against the Mafia in Italy.

This translates as: Western governments are more or less like a mafia and people have every right to abolish them.

While Moscow seems to be the only safe place for whistle blowers, Moscow will not make “extra efforts” to protect whistle blowers.

You will have to look after your self, pay rent yourself and so on.

the world is taken hostage by debt in foreign currency

the debt game is very old and is heavily used by the mafia “you owe us protection money”.

it’s a sad day and we wonder what will come out of this.

Julian Assange was arrested

Here you can see how much a vote counts, because people in Ecuador have voted for a more pro US president – and that is the result.

Julian Assange 47, has been living at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since 2012

“In march 2012, in the capital of Belize, the brother of the President of Ecuador, Lenin Moreno, Edwin Moreno Garcés was a phantom company, commonly referred to as offshore under the name INA INVESTMENT CORP.

His name is not an acronym or anything like that but the acronym of the last three letters of the three daughters that the president of Ecuador Lenin Moreno Garcés had with his wife Rocío González Navas:

IrINA, CarINA and CristINA

The phantom company of which the Chairman says have nothing to do, but takes implicit the name of their three daughters was in the first instance created with the purpose of receiving monies through the “entrepreneur,” and at the same time their front man Xavier Macias Carmignani is levied, the product of kickbacks to certain companies such as china’s SINOHYDRO and the panamanian RECORSA, paid for the lobbying carried out in the awards of certain concessions granted by the state.

In one of those movements, no more or less than $ 18 million was paid.

What are the INA PAPERS?

The INA PAPERS are an important series of documents that confirm the existence of a criminal organization led by the president of Ecuador Lenin Moreno Garcés and that having as its members his wife, First Lady Rocío González, his close friend, businessman and front man Xavier Macías Carmignani, his wife María Herdoiza Patiño, the sister-in-law of President Guisella González, the brother of the president, Edwin Moreno Garcés and the former ambassador of Panama to Mexico, Ricardo Alemán Alfaro along with half a dozen lawyers and secondary characters, by means of at least a dozen societies ghosts (offshore) incorporated in various tax havens have committed a series of crimes that include money laundering, tax evasion and tax compliance, the traffic of influences and the collection of coimas (bribery) to the detriment of the Ecuadorian state, the scope of which, given that illicit acts have been committed in different countries, has resulted in what, according to INTERPOL standards in the area of money laundering, categorizes as a transnational crime.
Ghost companies, crimes and lavish lives.

Names pompous as the HOLY SPIRIT HOLDINGS, FOUNDATION AMORE, FOUNDATION ESMALAU, FUNDACIÓN PACHA MAMA, INVESTMENTS LARENA, INVESTMENTS MASPAL, MANELA INVESTMENT CORP., PROBATA INVESTMENTS, SAN ANTONIO BUSINESS CORP, TURQUOISE HOLDINGS LTD, VALLEY VIEW BUSINESS CORP along with the infamous INA INVESTMENT CORP are some of the companies fantasy that this criminal organization used for decades for in addition to committing all of the crimes previously referred to, have been used as a bridge to the acquisition of goods lavish vehicles such as Ferrari brand, Wallets of crocodile, jewelry, the payment of eccentric trips around the world and even the acquisition below the level of real estate of apartments in luxury condominiums in Spain.

In this site we propose to the reader either a simple occasional person or an investigative journalist, see and record firsthand the evidence that opens the doors of presidential corruption in the Republic of Ecuador.

translated from:


UN experts urge UK to honour rights obligations and let Mr. Julian Assange leave Ecuador embassy in London freely

GENEVA (21 December 2018) – UN human rights experts today repeated a demand that the UK abides by its international obligations and immediately allows Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to walk free from the Ecuadorian embassy in London where he has been for over 6 years, fearing arrest by British authorities if he leaves, and extradition to the US.

“States that are based upon and promote the rule of law do not like to be confronted with their own violations of the law, that is understandable. But when they honestly admit these violations, they do honour the very spirit of the rule of law, earn enhanced respect for doing so, and set worldwide commendable examples,” the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) said.

In December 2015, the Working Group concluded in its opinion No. 54/2015 that Mr. Assange – who at the time had a European arrest warrant issued against him for an allegation of crimes committed in Sweden ‑ was being arbitrarily deprived of his freedom and demanded that he be released.

“Under international law, pre-trial detention must be only imposed in limited instances. Detention during investigations must be even more limited, especially in the absence of any charge” said the experts. “The Swedish investigations have been closed for over 18 months now, and the only ground remaining for Mr. Assange’s continued deprivation of liberty is a bail violation in the UK, which is, objectively, a minor offense that cannot post facto justify the more than 6 years confinement that he has been subjected to since he sought asylum in the Embassy of Ecuador. Mr. Assange should be able to exercise his right to freedom of movement in an unhindered manner, in accordance with the human rights conventions the UK has ratified,” the experts further said

The WGAD is further concerned that the modalities of the continued arbitrary deprivation of liberty of Mr. Assange is undermining his health, and may possible endanger his life given the disproportionate amount of anxiety and stress that such prolonged deprivation of liberty entails.

“The United Kingdom has ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and has a responsibility to honour its commitment, by respecting its provisions in all cases,” the experts said.

“As the High Commissioner for human rights said several years ago, human rights treaty law is binding law, it is not discretionary law. It is not some passing fancy that a state can apply sometimes and not in the other,” the experts recalled.

“In addition, the recommendations of the WGAD Opinions are expected to be implemented by all States, including those which have not been a party in the case concerning Mr. Assange,” said the experts.

“On 10 December, the world celebrated International Human Rights Day. Seventy years ago, on that very day, the United Nations proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the mother of all rights contained in subsequent conventions, including the ICCPR.

“It is time that Mr. Assange, who has already paid a high price for peacefully exercising his rights to freedom of opinion, expression and information, and to promote the right to truth in the public interest, recovers his freedom,” the experts concluded.

This statement by the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention is endorsed by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Mr. Michel Forst.


Background: Mr. Assange, a computer programmer and freedom of expression and information advocate, is the founder of Wikileaks, created to enable whistle-blowers to make public information they deem should be known in the public interest.

Mr. Assange was arrested on 7 December 2010 in the United Kingdom, pursuant to a European Arrest Warrant issued against him after he was accused of sexual misconduct in Sweden. That accusation has not been substantiated and after he was interrogated in London the Swedish Prosecutor decided in 2017 not to pursue the investigation.

Mr. Assange has been de facto arbitrarily deprived of his liberty since 2012 without charge or trial. He was first detained on remand and in isolation for 10 days in a prison in London; he then spent 550 days on bail terms constituting house arrest, pending his appeal before the UK’s Supreme Court against his extradition to Sweden. When the Supreme Court upheld the extradition decision, he sought political asylum in the Embassy of Ecuador on 16 August 2012, citing fears of being extradited from Sweden to the USA. He claimed that he had reasonable grounds to believe that should he be extradited to the USA, he would face trial for having published, through Wikileaks, thousands of US classified diplomatic cables and documents. Ecuador granted him political asylum and later Ecuadorian citizenship.

The United Kingdom has indicated that Mr. Assange’s fear to be extradited to the USA was unfounded. In April 2017, in his first public speech since becoming head of the CIA, Mr. Michael Pompeo described Wikileaks as a “hostile intelligence service” which claimed to act in the name of the defence of freedom of expression, freedom of information and privacy. The same month, the US Attorney General stated that it was a US priority to arrest and detain Julian Assange. On 15 November 2018, evidence emerged that the US Department of Justice was preparing an indictment against him but the charges have remained classified.

As a result of the Swedish Prosecutor’s decision not to pursue the investigation against Mr. Assange, the European Arrest Warrant against him was nullified. The remaining ground for arresting him is his violation of the terms of the bail in 2012, when he walked to the embassy of Ecuador to seek political asylum. The terms of bail included reporting daily to the local police station.

The UK authorities have made it clear that should he leave the Ecuadorian Embassy he would be arrested. An arrest warrant has been issued against Mr. Assange by a British court,  and police have been assigned since 2012 to stand-by 24/7 at the embassy gate to arrest Mr. Assange should he exit the diplomatic premises.

* The experts: Mr. Seong-Phil Hong, Chair-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention; Mr. Michel Forst, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders.

Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.

For media requests please contact Jeremy Laurence, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+41 22 917 9383, Email: For further information please contact Mr. Christophe Peschoux (+41 229279381 or +41 79 101 04 88 Email:

UN Human Rights, country page: United Kingdom

For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts please contact Jeremy Laurence, UN Human Rights – Media Unit (+41 22 917 9383, Email:

This year, 2018, is the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the UN on 10 December 1948. The Universal Declaration – translated into a world record 500 languages – is rooted in the principle that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” It remains relevant to everyone, every day. In honour of the 70th anniversary of this extraordinarily influential document, and to prevent its vital principles from being eroded, we are urging people everywhere to Stand Up for Human Rights:



Green Party 4 point plan for affordable housing

(scroll down for Deutsch)

  1. housing as a focal point of EU funding: multi-annual financial framework re-orienting the billions of European funding have so far been scarce in social housing.
    • The funds of the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) may only be used for the construction of housing in the event of energy recovery. Use for social housing has so far been limited to marginalised groups, especially Roma (!WTF!?). EU support for housing for Roma is right, so that people in their home have a home and do not have to flee from bitter poverty to the pedestrian zones of other countries. For the next EU budget framework 2021-2027, however, we want to make public housing for all people with low incomes a priority for European funding. At the green Initiative, the aim of social housing is already in the decision on the ERDF, which the European Parliament voted on last week. Investment in housing is to be promoted with EU money when Real Estate is owned by public or not-for-profit and reserved for low-income households or people with disabilities. The European Social Fund (ESF) should also provide targeted funding to support access to suitable housing. The negotiations between parliament and the Council of the member states are only taking place after the European elections. Every vote for Green is a vote for more EU money for social housing.
  2. detoxifying the real estate market: money laundering, letter-box companies and speculation ending rents are rising for a number of reasons.The inflow of black money also aggravates the tense situation on the real estate markets.Germany has the reputation of being a money laundering machine for the Italian Mafia and Russian oligarchs.And this, although we greens in Europe have been able to enforce hard rules against money laundering.Many actors are required by EU law to alert when money laundering is suspected.What makes Germany attractive for money laundering, the deliberate Non-application of European Law.Because anonymity is not a Problem when buying real estate worth millions so far, Schwarzgeld feels so comfortable in Germany’s cities.The number of suspected reports on money laundering by notaries, lawyers and real estate agents is close to the detection limit, although they are obliged to spontaneous reports under the Money Laundering Act.More active supervision of public authorities is needed, so that the current law is finally implemented.All federal states have to fulfil their task of preventing money laundering with regard to Real Estate in particular.In addition, the federal government must at last provide the Financial Intelligence Unit (currently at customs) with personnel, technical and police data in such a way that it can fulfil its tasks effectively.”Property required. Its use should at the same time serve the benefit of the general public,“ says the Basic Law.However, the social obligation is difficult to enforce when owners hide behind a letter box company.Tenants have a right to know their owners.Finally, it often makes a big difference whether an urgent repair happens quickly, or by an anonymous property management company on the long bench pushed.To make letter box companies transparent, has the EU imposed a Transparency Register of beneficial owners on the basis of much green pressure.But the grand coalition in Berlin denies proper implementation.The transparency register on economically entitled persons must at last actually provide information about the true owners of all companies in Germany, as provided for by European law.The German special rule that box structures are allowed to remain anonymous, contradicts European law.Therefore, the German implementation of the 4. Anti-money laundering policy.Because the Berlin grand coalition has so far ignored all calls, we Greens have filed an infringement complaint with the European Commission in the European Parliament.
  3. a European legal framework for social and good housing to co-ordinate national policies wherever important policy is above all national competence, the EU can nevertheless co-ordinate with a legal framework.We want such a European legal framework for social and good housing.Social housing must be a European priority.The enforcement of EU state aid rules must not lead to the disadvantage of social housing compared to profit-oriented real estate companies or to the creation of “Ghettos” more socially disadvantaged. We want to promote diverse neighborhoods. The EU Commission can enforce the European legal framework of the open method of coordination. The European Commission can make specific recommendations for social housing to national governments within the framework of the European semester, where this is particularly necessary.
  4. The Paris climate agreement is a great success of European diplomacy to prevent climate collapse. In order to achieve the goal of limiting global warming to below 1.5 percent, all countries must comply with their obligations. By December 2019, the federal government must report to the EU Commission its binding national action plan on climate and energy. For the action plan, we call for a comprehensive Definition of energy poverty, quantified objectives and effective measures to reduce it. In order to achieve these goals, the federal government must present an ambitious long-term renovation strategy. The Federal government should develop the strategy, with the involvement of representatives of the anti – poverty and women’s associations and social housing representatives. The renovation strategy must focus on funding for the renovation of buildings where low-income people live. The rate of renovation must be set at least three percent. In order to reach them, appropriate measures are needed in the field of advice, financing, urban and spatial planning.

Auto translated from:

2018-10: 90% of major European banks already sanctioned for money laundering

Also involved: Dankse Bank, Deutsche Bank but also Spanish Santander bank and the British banks HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS.


Grüner Plan für gutes und bezahlbares Wohnen in Europa

Wohnen ist die soziale Frage unserer Zeit. In Deutschland geben 16 Prozent der Menschen mehr als 40 Prozent ihres Einkommens fürs Wohnen aus. Das ist in der EU die zweitschlimmste Belastung nach Griechenland. Der reine #Mietenwahnsinn! In Rumänien leben 50 Prozent der Menschen in überbelegten Wohnungen. 95 Prozent der Griech*innen mit niedrigem Einkommen erleben eine Explosion ihrer Wohnkosten (Quelle: FEANTSA). Dass sich Menschen ein zentrales Grundbedürfnis wie Wohnen nicht leisten können, ist ein bedroht das Grundrecht auf Wohnen. Erst recht in unserem reichen Land. Die Verdrängung von Menschen aus den Städten ist eine Gefahr für den Zusammenhalt unserer Gesellschaft.

Die Verdrängung ist aber nicht nur für die Betroffenen, sondern auch für die Wirtschaft ein Problem. Gutes Personal ist ein wichtiger Standortfaktor. Wenn die Wohnungssuche zum unüberwindlichen Hindernis wird, wird es für Firmen noch schwieriger Mitarbeiter zu finden. Gutes und bezahlbares Wohnen gehört zur notwendigen Infrastruktur für wirtschaftliche Stärke. Gerade in den Städten und Regionen mit gutem Entwicklungspotential wird der Mietenwahnsinn zum Wirtschaftshemmnis.

Wohnen ist keine europäische Kern-Zuständigkeit. Die meisten Hebel sind in der Hand der nationaler, regionaler und kommunaler Politik. Das wollen wir auch nicht ändern, denn Boden und Immobilien sind immobil und die Verhältnisse von Ort zu Ort sehr unterschiedlich. Aber auch Europa muss aber im Rahmen seiner Zuständigkeiten zu Lösungen für diese wichtige Herausforderung beitragen. Dieser Plan fasst zusammen, was wir in der Europäischen Union tun können.

der Grüne 4 Punkte Plan

1 | Wohnen als Schwerpunkt der EU-Fördermittel: Mehrjährigen Finanzrahmen neu ausrichten

Die Milliarden der europäischen Fördermittel fließen bisher kaum in sozialen Wohnraum. Die Mittel des Europäischen Fonds für regionale Entwicklung (EFRE) dürfen für Wohnungsbau nur bei energetischer Sanierung eingesetzt werden. Die Verwendung für sozialen Wohnungsbau ist bisher beschränkt auf marginalisierte Gruppen, insbesondere Roma. Die EU-Förderung für Wohnungen für Roma ist richtig, damit Menschen in ihrer Heimat ein Zuhause haben und nicht vor bitterer Armut in die Fußgängerzonen anderer Länder flüchten müssen. Für den nächsten EU-Haushaltsrahmen 2021-2027 wollen wir gemeinwohlorientiertes Wohnen für alle Menschen mit niedrigem Einkommen aber zum Schwerpunkt für europäische Fördermittel machen. Auf Grüne Initiative hin, steht das Ziel des sozialen Wohnungsbaus bereits im Beschluss zum EFRE, den das Europaparlaments letzter Woche abgestimmt hat. Investitionen in Wohnungsbau sollen mit EU-Geld gefördert werden, wenn Immobilien im öffentlichen oder im gemeinnützigen Besitz sind und für Haushalte mit niedrigem Einkommen oder Menschen mit Behinderungen reserviert. Auch aus dem Europäischen Sozialfond (ESF) sollen gezielt Gelder zur Verfügung stehen zur Förderung von Zugang zu geeignetem Wohnraum. Die Verhandlungen zwischen Parlament und Rat der Mitgliedstaaten gehen erst nach der Europawahl richtig los. Jede Stimme für Grün ist eine Stimme für mehr EU-Geld für sozialen Wohnungsbau.

2 | Immobilienmarkt entgiften: Geldwäsche, Briefkastenfirmen und Spekulation beenden

Mieten steigen aus mehreren Gründen.

Auch der Zufluss von Schwarzgeld verschlimmert die angespannte Lage auf den Immobilienmärkten.

Ausgerechnet Deutschland hat den Ruf, Geldwaschmaschine für die italienische Mafia und russische Oligarchen zu sein.

Und das obwohl wir Grünen in Europa harte Regeln gegen Geldwäsche mit durchsetzen konnten.

Viele Akteure sind per EU-Gesetz verpflichtet, beim Verdacht auf Geldwäsche Alarm zu schlagen.

Was Deutschland für Geldwäsche attraktiv macht, ist die bewusste Nicht-Anwendung europäischen Rechts.

Weil Anonymität beim Kauf millionenschwerer Immobilien bisher kein Problem ist, fühlt sich Schwarzgeld in Deutschlands Städten so wohl.

Die Zahl der Verdachtsmeldungen auf Geldwäsche von Notaren, Rechtsanwälten und Immobilienmaklern bewegen sich nahe der Nachweisgrenze, obwohl sie zu spontanen Meldungen nach dem Geldwäschegesetz verpflichtet sind.

Es braucht eine aktivere Aufsicht staatlicher Stellen, damit das geltende Recht endlich auch vollzogen wird.

Alle Bundesländer müssen ihrer Aufgabe zur Prävention von Geldwäsche gerade mit Bezug auf Immobilien besser nachkommen.

Außerdem muss die Bundesregierung die Financial Intelligence Unit (derzeit beim Zoll) endlich personell, technisch und bei den Zugängen zu polizeilichen Daten so ausstatten, dass sie ihre Aufgaben auch wirksam erfüllen kann.

„Eigentum verpflichtet. Sein Gebrauch soll zugleich dem Wohle der Allgemeinheit dienen,“ sagt das Grundgesetz.

Die Sozialpflicht ist aber schwer durchzusetzen, wenn sich Eigentümer hinter einer Briefkastenfirmen verstecken.

Mieter haben ein Recht, ihren Eigentümer zu kennen.

Schließlich macht es oft einen großen Unterschied, ob eine eilige Reparatur schnell passiert oder von einer anonymen Hausverwaltungsfirma auf die lange Bank geschoben wird.

Um Briefkastenfirmen transparent zu machen, hat die EU auf viel grünen Druck hin ein Transparenzregister der wirtschaftlich Berechtigten vorgeschrieben.

Doch die große Koalition in Berlin verweigert die ordentliche Umsetzung.

Das Transparenzregister über wirtschaftlich Berechtigte muss endlich tatsächlich Auskunft über die wahren Eigentümer von allen Firmen in Deutschland geben, wie es das Europarecht vorsieht.

Die deutsche Sonderregelung, dass Schachtelkonstruktionen anonym bleiben dürfen, widerspricht europäischem Recht.

Daher muss die deutsche Umsetzung der 4. Anti-Geldwäsche-Richtlinie nachgebessert werden.

Weil die Berliner Große Koalition alle Aufforderungen bisher ignoriert, haben wir Grünen im Europaparlament eine Vertragsverletzungsbeschwerde bei der EU-Kommission eingereicht.

3 | Ein europäischer Rechtsrahmen für soziale und gute Wohnungen, um nationale Politiken zu koordinieren

Wo wichtige Politik vor allem nationale Zuständigkeit ist, kann die EU dennoch mit einem Rechtsrahmen koordinierend eingreifen.

Wir wollen einen solchen europäischen Rechtsrahmen für soziales und gutes Wohnen.

Sozialer Wohnungsbau muss eine europäische Priorität sein.

Die Durchsetzung der EU-Regeln für staatliche Beihilfen darf nicht zum Nachteil für sozialen Wohnungsbau gegenüber gewinnorientierten Immobilienunternehmen führen oder zur Schaffung von “Ghettos” sozial Benachteiligter führen. Wir wollen vielfältige Nachbarschaften fördern. Die EU-Kommission kann den europäische Rechtsrahmen mit der Methode der offenen Koordinierung Stück für Stück durchsetzen. Die EU-Kommission kann den nationalen Regierungen im Rahmen des Europäischen Semesters gezielt Empfehlungen für soziales Wohnen machen, wo dies besonders notwendig ist.

4 | Ökologischen Wohnraum im Rahmen der verbindlichen EU-Klimaziele sozialverträglich fördern

Das Pariser Klimaabkommen ist ein großer Erfolg der europäischen Diplomatie, um den Klimakollaps zu verhindern. Um das Ziel zu erreichen, die globale Erwärmung auf unter 1,5 Prozent zu begrenzen, müssen alle Länder ihren Verpflichtungen nachkommen. Bis Dezember 2019 muss die Bundesregierung dafür ihren verbindlichen nationalen Aktionsplan zu Klima und Energie an die EU-Kommission melden. Für den Aktionsplan fordern wir eine umfassende Definition zu Energiearmut sowie quantifizierte Ziele und effektive Maßnahmen zu deren Minderung. Um diese Ziele zu erreichen, muss die Bundesregierung eine ambitionierte langfristige Renovierungsstrategie vorzulegen. Die Bundesregierung sollte die Strategie unter Einbeziehung von Vertretern der Armuts- und Frauenverbände sowie von Sozialwohnungsbauvertretern erarbeiten. Die Renovierungstrategie muss die Finanzierung für die Renovierung von Gebäuden, in denen einkommensschwache Menschen wohnen, in den Mittelpunkt stellen. Die Rate der Renovierung muss auf mindestens drei Prozent festgelegt werden. Um sie zu erreichen, braucht es entsprechende Maßnahmen im Bereich Beratung, Finanzierung, Stadt- und Raumplanung.


2018-10: 90% of major European banks already sanctioned for money laundering

Also involved: Dankse Bank, Deutsche Bank but also Spanish Santander bank and the British banks HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds and RBS.