Methods

the rule over others, almost always went wrong

(wrong = egoism & (lobby-induced) corruption & mismanagement lead to hunger and uprisings)

so maybe its time for America to reinvent itself?

so maybe its time for everyone to rule themselves?

should not the state educate people how to survive, in balance with nature, by their own hands? (give em a piece of land and the equipment to survive there, there is enough land between the east and the west coast)

rule over others = slavery = exploitation is so damn devilish profitable

the biggest problem is:

  • the “pile of shit problems”, that were created over decades of erosion grew so big, it can not be ignored anymore (it’s like a ship who’s mast has a lot of cracks, but nobody bothers to build a new more sustainable ship)
  • “western” democracy in it’s current form has proven many times to be unable to solve problems in a competent way, so “the world” is in a state of turmoil, lack of orientation and uncertainty, because of a in-competent decision making process plus: the decision making process is so “abstract” that “the masses” lost track, who is actually to blame for what.
  • rule over others = slavery = exploitation is so damn devilish profitable, but the planet belongs to everyone
  • “western” democracy accepted itself as perfect,  did not actively (funding!) search for alternatives to itself (arrogance)
  • thus “western” democracy “forgot” to look for alternatives (can be other forms of democracy)
  • thus did not do any experiment with alternative forms of government
    • (except Chinese communism experimented very “successfully” (more money, more pollution plus all the negative side effects that a money-centric lifestyle brings about) with neoliberal capitalism)
  • “going back” to dictatorship/monarchy can hardly be considered a step forward

US-America needs to reinvent itself

I wish them a lot of success! 🙂

There are (still despite all the cuts to education budget) creative and clever people there!

i just hope there are enough innovative and clever people there that also have a moral compass and i wish them to succeed in their efforts

David Graeber is an Intelligent human being – an activist – active in occupy wallstreet and so on.

His book – debt the first 5000 years – is a scientific very detailed 534 pages book – but what he misses – what is wrong with debt?

let me tell you what is wrong – with the interest on debt monetary system:

repaying debt is not so easy, not only because of the interest-on-interest effect but also – the money to pay the interest – IS NEVER CREATED in the first place – the game is rigged. (see another great book: Bernard Lietaer “rethinking money”)

Here comes the (simplified but still true) example:

imagine a world where there is only one bank and two shoe companies:

  • company A shoes
  • company B shoes

Bank X is given a loan from the central bank of $100.000 in cash (the central bank is the only bank allowed to issue cash).

The $100.000 Bank X keeps as reserves (10% in reality this would be only 1%).

This allows Bank X to lend out 100% of the $100.000 meaning $1.000.000 or one million in “book money” (money that only exists in the books or in computers).

So Bank X can gives company A and company B a loan of $450.000 to start their business and wants every year a modest rate of 3% interest.

The problem: the 3% interest ($13.500 in the first year) ARE NEVER GENERATED and thus one of the loans HAS to fail.

So after the first year – already $27.000 of interest would need to be paid to Bank X – but because this money was never created in the first place it can not be paid unless…

Company A needs to “extract” money/steal from company B in order to repay their debt or face bankruptcy.

Eventually one of the companies will have to close down – people lose their jobs – and the other company then has a monopoly on shoes – the prices for shoes skyrocket X-D

Because the interest-money is never created, it is not in the game, one of the competitors has to fail so the other competitor can repay the loan.

This is evil.

It is evil because sets people against each other in very very aggressive and evil way and calls it “normal”.

This will create a society of thieves and robbers and this is exactly what we have today.

did you know the “privatization” comes from the the latin word “privare” which literately means to steal? (deprive, rob)

The Goldman Sachs saying: “it is not enough that you win – others have to lose”

is not exactly correctly, more correct would be:

“in order to win – others will have to lose”

because those are the (current rules) of this catastrophic debt based game.

Here is another piece of wisdom: NEVER lend money to family or friends or you will lose both.

instead: if a friend or family member is in need ask them what they need and buy it for them. (help with material not with money directly)

or: give the money as a gift.

never the less Graeber keep up the good work.

Lietaer has unfortunately passed away.

https://youtu.be/La8Pw8tjciI
https://youtu.be/La8Pw8tjciI

https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/07/1068631

She tackles the horrifying terrible crimes of the human race in the most fucked up corners of this beautiful planet

She can bring attention not only to the:

  • UN (which was formed after ww2 – to keep dialogue between almost all nations of this planet going – even those that hate each other – to prevent further useless wars and terrible escalations but has been looked at with scorn and rendered powerless by the US)
  • but to those very tough topics
  • UN blue helmets are very much in need around the globe – as an 3rd objective independent party – that can help bring peace to opposing forces
https://twitter.com/UNPeacekeeping/status/1110945575657103361
https://twitter.com/UNPeacekeeping/status/1110945575657103361

respect2Angelina!

not a lot of wealthy rich western people dedicate their time helping the poorest in the most fucked up corners of this beautiful planet

a hero not only in the movies – but also in real life

PS: sorry it did not work out with Brad :-p

soon UN blue helmets in Donbass?

There are a lot of UN blue helmet peace keeping missions in progress around the globe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_peacekeeping_missions

What is important, even when the UN headquarters are based in NY (should be moved to some independent island)

  • that the UN stays active and as independent an unbiased as possible
  • the UN must at all costs avoid to become “a tool” for the US or other nations
  • blue helmets send to Donbass should neither from Ukraine nor from Russia (independent parties) that can report truthfully what the situation is and try to keep the peace

To invite the UN peacekeepers in the Donbass: Pristayko announced a plan in case of failure in Minsk

Ukraine has not officially turned to the UN with the issue of the peacekeepers, but this proposal had been received from Russia, said Pristayko.

auto translated from: https://glavred.info/politics/10130525-priglasit-mirotvorcev-oon-na-donbass-pristayko-ozvuchil-plan-na-sluchay-provala-v-minske.html

The administration of US President Donald trump intends to discuss with the Russian side a plan to deploy 20 thousand peacekeepers in the Donbas.

The United States wants to introduce 20 thousand peacekeepers in the Donbass

How it transmits Axar.az , this is reported by the American newspaper The Wall Street Journal.

This issue is expected to be raised in the coming days. According to the newspaper, according to American and other Western diplomats, this mission can operate under the auspices of the OSCE, and not the UN.

As the newspaper notes, this plan will become one of the parts of the US strategy against Russia, aimed at Moscow’s compliance with the Intermediate-range nuclear forces Treaty (INF).

auto translated from: https://ru.axar.az/news/vmire/224291.html

since “early 2014, fighting has left more than 11,000 dead and thousands injured”

source: https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/eastern-europe/ukraine/donbas-peacekeeping-opportunities-and-risks

Casualties and losses
4,431 killed[17][18][19]
70 missing[20]
9,500–10,500 wounded[21]
5,670 killed[*][21][22]
12,500–13,500 wounded[21]
3,353 civilians killed (315 in 2016–2020)[21][23]
13,000–13,200 killed; 29,000–31,000 wounded overall[21]
1,414,798 Ukrainians internally displaced; 925,500 fled abroad[24]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Donbass

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_peacekeeping

https://twitter.com/UNPeacekeeping