News

French Ex President Sarkozy accepted about 50 Mio USD from Libya’s (killed 2011 by rebel groups) dictator Gaddafi as “friendship gift” which he spend in the 2007 election campaign to win presidency by 53.1%.

Of course General Gaddafi ruled Libya with a iron fist and now another General tries to take power and brought war back to Libya.

General Haftar Attack of Tripoli escalates civil war in splintered Libya

04/11/2019  By Bob Tippee

New York Times: blocks proposed draft statement calling for halt to Libyan National Army offensive around . EU will now attempt to draft new statement.

The French oil company TOTAL is operating in Libya

and Gaddafi’s removal was very much in their interest.

When insurgents surged (maybe started by US CIA and  backed by the US) France stepped in with it’s Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier to drop even more bombs on Gaddafi – for the single purpose to directly extract the oil from the ground without a middleman.

March 2, 2018 / 8:30 AM:

Oil major TOTAL expands in Libya, buys U.S. Marathon‘s Waha stake for $450 million

The sideffects of this greedy tactic: the refugee crisis of 2015

which swept accross europe and the resulting boost for right-wing parties accross europe. (Poland is strictly Catholic, while massively profiting from EU investments, did not accept ANY refugees)

While Sarkozy is himself a centre-right politician – so i guess it is the old game: greedy eats brains.

Macron will probably be the last elected president of France, Le Pen will kill democracy in France – Sarkozy and TOTAL are to blame.

Just look at this horrible video from calais and you know why – 30.000 migrants try to cross over from France to UK, but are stuck in France for years.

Merkel ‘Fed up With Erdogan Blackmailing Germany’ With Refugee Deal

Mrs Merkel had to bribe Erdogan to keep the refugees in his country.

The people that flee are mostly – young male black that steal and rape.

And the European governments just don’t know what to do.

“GOOD JOB” all involved.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, on the situation in Libya, is a measure that was adopted on 17 March 2011. The Security Council resolution was proposed by France, Lebanon, and the United Kingdom.[1][2]

Hillary Clinton argued that, though arming anti-Gaddafi forces was not being proposed at the time, it would be legal to do so.[5]

(src: Wikipedia)

it seems NATO and was involved, Canadian Lt. Gen Charles Bouchard, WTF!? SERIOUSLY!

HERE YOU CAN SEE AGAIN: NATO IS A PROBLEM – NOT A SOLUTION!

Canada, want some refugees?

Military intervention in Libya began on 19 March, as fighter jets of the French Air Force destroyed several pro-Gaddafi vehicles advancing on rebel stronghold Benghazi. U.S. and British submarines then fired over 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles at targets throughout Libya, severely disabling the regime’s air defense capability and allowing a wider enforcement of the no-fly zone to begin. A coalition of 10 states from Europe and the Middle East initially participated in the intervention, later expanding to 17. On 31 March, NATO assumed command of the operation. The intervention succeeded in preventing pro-Gaddafi forces from capturing Benghazi.[16]

On 24 August, it was acknowledged for the first time that special forces troops from Britain,[17] Italy, France, Jordan, Qatar,[18] and the UAE[18] had intervened on the ground in Libyan territory, stepping up operations in Tripoli and other cities.[19] This has been questioned as a possible violation of Resolution 1973[20] although the use of special forces is not prohibited by the resolution.

Noam Chomsky has argued that the Western military intervention into Libya was a clear breach of UNSCR 1973 since it nullified the attempts for a ceasefire that were put forward by the resolution and welcomed by Gaddafi. As he puts it, “NATO powers (France and Britain in the lead and the United States following) violated the resolution, radically, and became the air force of the rebels. Nothing in the resolution justified that. It did call for “all necessary steps” to protect civilians, but there’s a big difference between protecting civilians and being the air force for the rebels.” [21]

(src: wikipedia)

IT IS SICKENING and might even result in many Hitlers 2.0 coming to power all across Europe

All for a little oil.

HURRAY!

“Businessman Ziad Takiéddine arrives at the anti-corruption police office in Nanterre, France, on November 17, 2016, for a hearing after admitting

he delivered three cash-stuffed suitcases from Libya’s Moammar Gaddafi to former French President Nicolas Sarkozy”

src: https://theintercept.com/2018/04/28/sarkozy-gaddafi-libya-bombing/

About Sarkozy:

He won the French presidential election, 2007 by a 53.1% to 46.9% margin to Socialist Ségolène Royal. During his term, he faced the late-2000s financial crisis (causing a recession and the European sovereign debt crisis) and the Arab Spring (especially in Tunisia, Libya, and Syria). He initiated the reform of French universities (2007) and the pension reform (2010).

He was the leader of the Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) party from 2004 to 2007.

Links:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/20/nicolas-sarkozy-police-custody-french-president-campaign-funding-libya

https://www.france24.com/en/20180321-sarkozy-placed-under-formal-investigation-illegal-campaign-financing-libya-gaddafi

http://www.leparisien.fr/politique/europeennes-les-republicains-attendent-un-geste-de-sarkozy-12-04-2019-8051634.php#xtor=AD-1481423553

https://twitter.com/hashtag/Sarkozy?f=tweets&vertical=default

https://twitter.com/hashtag/Libya?f=tweets&vertical=default

 

In this article, i explain why globalization and free trade, the Euro, the Euro-Zone is increasing unemployment, by making big companies even bigger, killing small companies in the process but never absorbing the work force of those small companies.

Self driving vehicles will kill -3.5 mio truck driver and -1 mio bus and taxi driver jobs

No matter how positive you might think about these details. For society they are BAD, BAD, BAD. More unemployment means more crime, although those drivers could focus on the “skills of tomorrow”  and do what machines can not do: develop their creativity and empathy. While i would like to see more truck drivers with empathy, You must be f****ing kidding me?

(src: datausa.io, alltrucking.com)

It’s not a secret.

A lot of companies not only Tesla, Uber and Mercedes are working heavily on autopilots for cars and trucks.

They spend an awful lot of developing them and a few deadly accidents later, let’s say in 2030 – trucks and taxis could be without human driver.

What if those 2.5Mio truck drivers hate self-driving trucks and hit the breaks on robots and block highways – this is what i call disruption – i would understand them, after all, they lose it all and gain nothing – because they do not possess the robots that will replace them.

Not okay: “Joe we will replace you with a robot by 2030”

Somewhat okay, but unrealistic, would need gov intervention: “Joe we will replace you with a robot by 2030, but keep paying you half the salary”

China gov subsidies robot research and development, “255 robots that can work around the clock”

they are used to sort parcels to districts and already replaced 60 human workers

“Simple manual jobs” vanish and new jobs are created in robotics.

… well do you spot a problem here? People hat handle parcels might not be capable of programing robots (who is?).

And once a robot is programed even the programmer himself/herself becomes “obsolete”.

This clearly leads to a way of life that creates unemployment on a massive scale and in-debts private households, because if humans labor (manual or sophisticated) is not needed anymore – what else can they trade with the rest of “free markets”?

Nothing. They have nothing to trade.

Economy 4.0 needs Society 4.0 and LifeStyle 4.0 which would need redistribution of rights and privileges 4.0 or face ever growing disaster

From a mankind perspective – this is economically unsustainable – in the current system – in any universe – unless the robots are owned by all people.

or: the people do not need to work because the robots produce fresh vegetables for them FOR FREE in their own garden (THEY OWN THE GARDEN not Amazon!) and produce their own fresh water (not Nestle!) and produce their own electricity (not another company).

2016: Company China buys German manufacturing robots company Kuka

Automation is a technological solution that – at first sight – solve a problem – while under the current rule set of the system increases inequality and creates even bigger problems that were there in the first place (crime) – but were smaller.

While human level robots that would automate tasks such as elderly care taking, are still a thing of the future, but companies are never the less working on it and in 2050 – grandmum will be dealing with robots and robots only.

That would be a very sad future.

2016: “FRANKFURT (Reuters) – China’s Midea (000333.SZ) said it will complete its takeover of German robotics maker Kuka (KU2G.DE) in the first half of January after the United States authorities gave the deal a green light.

Midea, which launched a 4.5 billion euro ($5 billion) offer for Kuka in May, said Germany’s markets regulator had approved the settlement of the transaction, allowing it to control a 94.55 percent voting stake in Kuka from January onwards.” (src: reuters.com)

Artificial Intelligence:

manufacturers and logistic companies, hope to save even more jobs and money with AI.

creativity and empathy are the “skills” of tomorrow

now who in the future 4.0 will pay me the unemployed 4.0 for empathy and creativity?

(i don’t know, maybe an government 4.0)

…when you live in the “unemployment per default” future… or maybe unemployment needs to be redefined? But then also private properties and barb wires will have to go… unlikely to happen under the current mindset… i wonder when Mr Bezos (Amazon, richest man) will buy the world and all it’s resources (especially water) and rent it to us SLAVES… what he already does?  That was fast.

“we will make life easier for our workers and our customers”

… the only reasonable use of robots i can see right now: CLEAN UP THIS PLANET! START WITH FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR WASTE! DAMN IT!

the question needs to be: who profits from insecurity, hatred and fear?

  • the industrial military complex
    • weapons industry promising security with the latest weapons, while selling them also to all sides of a conflict for maximum profit
  • Trump?
  • Dictators
  • Surveillance Agencies

Where did he get the weapons from?

“Experts argue that New Zealand has indeed been on the cusp of change in gun legislation for years but never had political unity around the issue.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/gun-owners-in-new-zealand-brace-for-big-changes-to-their-right-to-carry/2019/03/18/6460f8e0-48ec-11e9-8cfc-2c5d0999c21e_story.html

it seems in New Zealand you can easily buy M16 assault rifles. (AR-15 Rifles with select fire modes are classified as M16)

‘The owner of Christchurch’s “Gun City”

Gun City: the World’s Largest Gun Store!

store said it sold four guns and ammunition to the alleged mosque shooter through a “police-verified online mail order process.”‘

PM: Ardern: ‘Our gun laws will change’ (src: afr.com)

Who/What creates terrorists/fanatics?

  •  war
    • in capitalism, the way business/the economy is operating is war, aggressive, ruthless, regarding social and environmental costs
    • causes fear, hate, refugees
    • fear and hate are also caused by the media / propaganda institutions, transmitting it, transporting it, increasing it, blowing it out of proportion
  • unemployment, poverty, misery, meaningless lifes that can be blamed on others
    • a lot of Afghan terrorists literately have nothing to lose because they are poor and without a perspective in life
  • fanaticism, ideologies promising “quick solutions” and blame the others
    • Trump loves to blame everyone else but himself

There you have it.

Another breed of more than brutal fanaticism.

He shoots at unarmed women then drives over them in his car.

This is not heroic this is the worst beast mankind can be.

NSA – has not seen it coming?

Another major catastrophe that all the “defense” and “security” billions for secret agencies “did not see coming” – seriously?

Or simply ignored it – because it fits their agenda.

Fear of terrorism means more governmental budget for surveillance and intelligence services such as CIA, NSA, GCHQ, Mi6, Mi5, NZSIS – you name it.

Trump, Bannon, Bolsonaro

Well done Mr Bannon – well done Mr Trump – i really do no get how this “helps” the world – of course we need an alternative to the current gridlock of lobby money driven democracy corruption.

I even think maybe the US is too big for democracy to work properly – look at Switzerland and Iceland – it works well there, but most western countries are too big for democracy to function properly.

Greece – the country where democracy was invented – nowadays measures only 10 million people.

Mr Bannon and Mr Trump just want to destroy – they are not a true alternative.

Black got fooled once more and voted for the wrong guy.

Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro Meets With Donald Trump to Consolidate Their Far-Right Alliance

‘There is perhaps no foreign leader more in tune with Donald Trump than Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro.

Both men are unscripted, uninformed, and unburdened by the truth; they’ve whipped up devoted mass followings by breaking with conventions and using direct, simple language to preach a message of violence, hatred, victimhood, right-wing culture war, anti-science, and “anti-globalism.”‘ (src: theintercept.com)

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2019/03/12/czech-republic-pm-gives-president-trump-a-cz-75-republika-pistol/

very bad timing X-D

great – i wonder when Trump will comes to Germany to meet NPD, AfD and other Nazis.

They will hand him a golden baseball bat.

Maybe with some Muslim blood on it, still wet of course.

from there its not far to… the 4th REICH.

Trump is a “a symbol of renewed white identity”

‘US President Donald Trump, who was referred to as “a symbol of renewed white identity” in the suspected attacker’s manifesto, described the tragedy as a “horrible massacre” and expressed solidarity with New Zealand, while simultaneously downplaying the threat of rising white nationalism around the world.’ (src: dw.com)

The Christians vs Moslem conflict – cui bono? Who profits?

You tell me! I am not!

Major fuel into the conflict between “Christians” “The West” and “Moslems” “Middle East” was of course 9-11.

Until today Saudi Arabia’s involvement was never a major topic, because after all, they are loyal US-friends and have secret deals for weapons, protection.

At the same time they are used for the dirty work and bomb Yemen.

All hijackers of 9-11 were Saudis, not Afghans!

Bin Laden (born 1957 Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) himself was a Saudi.

But completely out of logic – who/what countries have been attacked/bombed by “the West”?

By Bush’s USA further increasing the floods of refugees?

Bush’s “Coalition of the killing” (full list of countries here, this site studies it in detail) after 2001-09-11 attacked:

  • 2001: Afghanistan until today (not Saudi Arabia)
  • 2003: Iraq (also not Saudi Arabia)
  • 2011: Syria until today (also not Saudi Arabia, caused major flood of refugees to Europe)
  • 2012: Mali until today (Tuareg Revolution in Africa, Africa is not Saudi Arabia)
  • 2011: Libya (also not Saudi Arabia, caused major flood of refugees to Europe)
  • 2015: Yemen until today
  • and further escalations planned by the Pentagon:
    • Venezuela?
      • … then Cuba?
    • Iran?
      • … then China?

(today is 2019-03)

Does the US-BigOil-Dollar-imperialistic Empire have to end before this Ends?

Or will it even survive the collapse of the US-Dollar?

BOMBS DON’T DISTINGUISH BETWEEN COMBATANT AND CIVILIAN! (CHILDREN, WOMEN, ELDERLY)

WAR IS TERRORISM!

If you stop wars you stop terrorism!

“Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” – US Federal Bureau of Investigation

When Bush meant “war on terror” he meant “more terror through wars”

Capitalism loves wars: