Psychology / SocialSkills / InterHumanCompetence

always start with something positive, a positive vision utopia

  • a (almost) perfect mankind
    • everyone would cultivate a humble and kind lifestyle, eager to learn and develop (oneself, help others, settle on other planets, ensure the survival of conscious life in the universe) and dedicate a significant amount of time to family and friends
  • a (almost) perfect society
    • would be 100% crime free
    • would survive in perfect self sustaining balance with it’s habitat (0% no waste, 100% recycling, except the dead really should not be recycled out of respect and ethical reasons)
  • a (almost) perfect system
    • everything would survive within a perfect waste-free-recycling-circle of resources (even CO2)
    • what is known as “work” would be obsolete in the sense, that everyone is self-sufficient and self-employed (enough access to enough land that organically with  houses, machines and robots, tools can easily repaired with 3D printed parts)
      • of course there would and should still be “work”, like gardening by hand, because it is simply healthy for the body and mind
      • of course robots and machines will never exist without maintenance (and probably there will be also other chores)
      • but the amount of chores would be 1% of the human lifetime, while 99% go into what was stated above
      • not because anyone is forcing anyone, but because of the realization, that that is important
    • 100% of all energy would be renewables with the possibility of long-term storage and transport in chemical form

money can not work, only people can utilize money to work for good or evil

(and thus destroy value and society or add-create value to society)

the majority of the “new world order” is actually not so hidden (okay there are very secretive elitist groups like skull and bones that like to conspire among each other in order to gain power, money and influence yes… this is just as the mafia does it and it is an old game called “corruption”, those should NEVER get a job in government)

but the 90% of “the new wealth order” majority is actually not-so-hidden…

from 1200 BC

the last few hundred years…

as can be seen above… not much has changed over the centuries… it is very simple…

  1. those that own land and houses that others want to rent to create-add real value to society (e.g. a company with real jobs in the real economy adding real value to society (like healthcare or healthy products))
  2. those that own the company
    • they “have” (hopefully) smart and hard working employees that create satisfied customers that bring more customers so the company can live on and not go bankrupt
    • the self-employed owners of the company have a little tax advantage over their employees (might get a share of the net gains of the company, or a company-sponsored car)
      • but they also have the disadvantage of “owning” all the responsibility/risk/debt/paperwork that comes with a company
    • the CEO can deduct some “accepted” spendings from tax (all that is required for the company to work, from toilet paper, to energy to computers)
    • if it is not a investor owned corrupt CEO run company, but a company that actually cares about people, their product and the planet, than this is (imho) what is called “the middle-class” everyone is talking about (those with ideas for products and then actually realize them by the power of creativity and dilligence)
      • those are the ones that constantly try to make “their company” better, more efficient, saver, smarter and also (hopefully) feel the responsibility to “safe the company” and the jobs and families attached
      • the troubles: either the management is incompetent or the communication and the family-run company is bad and this leads to bad results and in worst case tensions and bankruptcy of the company
      • (this is how a lot of family run companies end)
  3. those that have a job in a company that adds-create real value to society (such as health or healthy products)
    • they have advantages over unemployed:
      • their value as hard workers is accepted by  society (even if it is in a job as tax consultant, that create-adds zero value to society) because they get up at 7 and work from 8 AM to 5 PM ( or longer), 5 days a week (tendency: increasing)
      • they can complain with all other workers how unfair it is that others drive Porsche (that they will never be able to afford)
      • they can complain how bad their boss is/or how lazy the unemployed neighbor is
  4. the unemployed
    • they are the bottom feeders and some feel very worthless (which is psychologically devastating, it is a pity, because everybody can do something / add-create value to society, but society often fails to organize those possibilities, but some also never felt the need to work to survive… there is a easy solution for that: give em a free parachute flight above panama with an GPS tracker… and pick em up 3 weeks later)
    • can not even afford organic products and always need to buy cheapest (with most chemicals)
    • those that have 24-7 jobs hate them, because they get a little money (and possibly their ever increasing rent for the tier #1 humans paid by “the state”, and “the state” is whoever works and pays taxes)
    • but: they have a pretty functionality:
      • what others throw away, they use (if they are smart they even try to repair it)
        • so this is kind of a resource efficiency function (smart) unemployed people have (avoiding waste)

  1. everyone has the right to survive happily (ever after) and the (imho) obligation to actively cultivate happiness (it will NEVER be realized by eternal factors alone)
  2. the unemployed feel betrayed by the system (that led them down)
  3. the employed feel exploited by the boss / company
  4. those that run the company feel exploited by the tax-office and those that avoid taxes via panama
  5. the top 1-10% are the only winners of this system and only envy those that own more private yachts or jets than they do
  6. what is indisputable is that inequality will create social tensions and maybe even violence and revolution (where it is not even important how much someone actually owns or earns but the perception of it (the fancy car))
  7. what (unfortunately) is also true, is that there is not really fluidity between those layers
    • 90% of the people i know, are employed and will always stay employed and NEVER create a company (in some countries it really sucks to create a company… will get you in massive amounts bureaucrazy, costs and fear of the tax bureau (which is called “internal revenue service” in the USA)
    • only the very eager have a day-time job and at night work for their own company (if it works, nice, might also be able to afford the Porsche, if not… massively in debt that needs to be paid somehow (plus rent and other expenses) via the day-time-job).
  8. it would be healthy for everyone to walk in the shoes of the other to get an understanding and clear picture, what the status of mankind is.

every level has it’s challenges… some super-rich feel super-worthless because they (just as the unemployed) sometimes just do not know what to do with their time (except taking drugs and party).

in the end this is a too massive waste of human time and potential

this needs to change / be organized different, in an alternative (but not 1984) kind of way, and it can!

everybody can do something / create-add value to society (if everyone did… just a little… the world would be completely different)

  • democracy only works with jobs, if there are no jobs, there will be unsatisfied people that cry for “the strong man” to fix their problems (which then massively blows up in EVERYONE’s face, “because power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton 1887)
  • fairly and truthfully show and educate people about their possibilities (not all but quiet a lot have the ambition to “make it”)
  • when the market fails (ever increasing prices for assets that are vital for mankind to survive (water, food, “roof over the head and not freezing to death” housing + heating, healthcare, energy, transport (to hospital), access to financial services, communications) to provide humans what they need to survive, the gov-state has to step in and either buffer the markets effects (by gov-state itself become real-estate-owner and rent it out cheap to those in need, have sufficient water, food, energy supplies in stock in the case of market price shocks, or go even further and fix prices where this is possible)
  • ideas need funding, there need to be easy online platforms for people with ideas to get the funding needed to create the next innovative product and jobs
    • here gov and banks and startups (people-with-ideas) need to communicate frequently and work closely together to find solutions that work for all
  • those that do not see the need to work at all… may get a free parachute flight over panama
  • also: happiness (which to buddhist monks is actually nothing more than deep inner sustainable satisfaction) can be learned/cultivated by everyone – no matter what layer

links:

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Pyramid-of-capitalist-system_fig2_337993433

Why is that incredible unawareness or “blindness” of women when it comes to probably the most important task/decision making process on how to pick the right mate.

actually… “decision making” judging far reaching decisions, has never been the strong suit of humans, but humans do way better than this than apes.

The human brain is different from the ape brain, especially in the pre frontal cortex:

  • “Area 10 is one of the cortical areas of the frontal lobe involved in higher cognitive functions such as the undertaking of initiatives and the planning of future actions…”
  • “in the human brain is larger relative to the rest of the brain than it is in the apes”
  • “and its supragranular layers have more space available for connections with other higher-order association areas.”
  • “suggests that the neural substrates supporting cognitive functions associated with this part of the cortex enlarged and became specialized during hominid evolution.” (source)

Making mistakes here could endanger not only whole nations, but the very survival of all of mankind, the species of “homo” sapiens.

In other words: has nature “forgotten” to update the human’s brain on “how to pick a suitable mate” to the modern world? (where muscles and big breasts are still nice to have, but should not be the deciding factor)

We (mankind as long as it has brains) consider some truths to be self evident such as 1 plus 1 equals 2.

in the same category of “self evident” truths fall the following:

  1. men and women are both humans
  2. all humans have a psychology
  3. nature “designed” humans
    1. in a way, that nature “thinks” will ensure the survival of the species the best
      1. massive biodiversity (every human is unique in his genes = biodiversity = someone will have the right genes for the right immune system to survive the next pandemic)
    2. installed programs on humans, that nature “thinks” will serve it’s aims for maximum probability of survival
    3. ensure the best biodiversity, preserve “the individual” (!) human, the individual couple, the individual family…
  4. men have to be best at everything especially football and soccer (run fast, throw far, so when they ever encounter a lion they are the ones to (probably) survive the best)
  5. women have the very challenging task to identify the traits  in men that are “probably” best suited for survival (of herself, the kids = the genes)
  6. this is exactly the reason women favor men that drive expensive big cars, because big expensive car “look like” this dude is “surviving well” in the currently rule set of capitalism
    1. So men are always under the pressure to drive the biggest best most expensive car or at least advertise themselves like “the best”
    2. women are under constant pressure to select the best man from this massive amount of (largely fake) and “make believe” and “where are the traps?” advertisement
  7. almost needless to say
    1. men often cheat in the advertisement process
    2. women often enough fall for the fake ads and fail to identify the cheaters early enough (before marriage and before kids) for various reasons
      1. whatever “looks” good on the outside, is not necessarily “good” on the inside
      2. if the package had “ashole” written all over it, it is irresponsible and unreasonable to still open the package, but women do anyway and then complain that what they picked is indeed an “ashole” completely unaware of the consequences (endless trauma, divorce and so on))

The psychology of money is also counterproductive in this, because brain scientists found, if humans center to much around money or the idea of money they tend to become reckless egoistic asholes.

But if women even encourage men to become asholes than we got:

moneysystem says: you should become an ashole

+

women say: you should become an ashole

= planet full of chaos & destruction by asholes

so why is it, that an expensive big car is STILL for (stupid) women enough “positive signal” to marry someone?

Even when it turns out expensive big cars can only be bought (not by hard fair labor) but also by:

  1. drug trafficking
  2. prostitution
  3. corruption

So capitalism is pretty clever in tricking the program nature installed on women.

A direct result of this, is the enormous amount of

  1. singles unable to find a suitable mate
  2. women pick “the wrong guy” (the asholes) thus actively encouraging more men to become asholes
  3. unlike 100 years ago (almost 100% of couples marry) to the year 2020 (almost 0% of couples marry) to almost 0% of couples want to have kids (breed more asholes)

Solutions for the dilemma please?

So the task for men and women (mankind) is to come up with a financial economic system that incentives positive human traits.

If parents do not care about the probability of survival of their kids – needless to say, the survival of mankind is at stake (exactly NOT what nature wanted).

to Women:

  1. ignore the Porsche
  2. build and train awareness what, REALLY makes a good mate fit for family & survival of the family and mankind (and even if that dude never will drive a Porsche, stick with it)
  3. if women fail to encourage men to become good humans (anything but psychopathic asholes) mankind is f***ed

everyone deserves to be happy (happiness in the buddhist sense is sustainable lasting satisfaction, be in balance/at peace with oneself and the world surrounding).

consciousness should be considered to be an important part what makes humans intelligent.

without conscious decision making, the most powerful tools (logic is just a tool) are put to bad use that could – in the end – endanger the survival of all mankind.

but who cares, if capitalism turned 90% of mankind into a bunch of ignorant, egoistic, idiotic, individualists that do not care about anything or anyone but themselves.

if those that get paid most, destroy mankind.

this needs to get better, otherwise the motivation if those that try to rescue mankind is seriously damaged and transits to desilution and isolation and “acceptance” of what seems to be impossible to change: the death of all mankind.

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herrerasaurusskeleton.jpg#mw-jump-to-license
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herrerasaurusskeleton.jpg#mw-jump-to-license

the dying out process has already begun with women subconsciously already knowing its going to end bad, no matter the state pays for childcare.

u can print money (if money is paper or digital)

u can not print planets, water, clean air, food or consciousness