Systems

Why is that incredible unawareness or “blindness” of women when it comes to probably the most important task/decision making process on how to pick the right mate.

actually… “decision making” judging far reaching decisions, has never been the strong suit of humans, but humans do way better than this than apes.

The human brain is different from the ape brain, especially in the pre frontal cortex:

  • “Area 10 is one of the cortical areas of the frontal lobe involved in higher cognitive functions such as the undertaking of initiatives and the planning of future actions…”
  • “in the human brain is larger relative to the rest of the brain than it is in the apes”
  • “and its supragranular layers have more space available for connections with other higher-order association areas.”
  • “suggests that the neural substrates supporting cognitive functions associated with this part of the cortex enlarged and became specialized during hominid evolution.” (source)

Making mistakes here could endanger not only whole nations, but the very survival of all of mankind, the species of “homo” sapiens.

In other words: has nature “forgotten” to update the human’s brain on “how to pick a suitable mate” to the modern world? (where muscles and big breasts are still nice to have, but should not be the deciding factor)

We (mankind as long as it has brains) consider some truths to be self evident such as 1 plus 1 equals 2.

in the same category of “self evident” truths fall the following:

  1. men and women are both humans
  2. all humans have a psychology
  3. nature “designed” humans
    1. in a way, that nature “thinks” will ensure the survival of the species the best
      1. massive biodiversity (every human is unique in his genes = biodiversity = someone will have the right genes for the right immune system to survive the next pandemic)
    2. installed programs on humans, that nature “thinks” will serve it’s aims for maximum probability of survival
    3. ensure the best biodiversity, preserve “the individual” (!) human, the individual couple, the individual family…
  4. men have to be best at everything especially football and soccer (run fast, throw far, so when they ever encounter a lion they are the ones to (probably) survive the best)
  5. women have the very challenging task to identify the traits  in men that are “probably” best suited for survival (of herself, the kids = the genes)
  6. this is exactly the reason women favor men that drive expensive big cars, because big expensive car “look like” this dude is “surviving well” in the currently rule set of capitalism
    1. So men are always under the pressure to drive the biggest best most expensive car or at least advertise themselves like “the best”
    2. women are under constant pressure to select the best man from this massive amount of (largely fake) and “make believe” and “where are the traps?” advertisement
  7. almost needless to say
    1. men often cheat in the advertisement process
    2. women often enough fall for the fake ads and fail to identify the cheaters early enough (before marriage and before kids) for various reasons
      1. whatever “looks” good on the outside, is not necessarily “good” on the inside
      2. if the package had “ashole” written all over it, it is irresponsible and unreasonable to still open the package, but women do anyway and then complain that what they picked is indeed an “ashole” completely unaware of the consequences (endless trauma, divorce and so on))

The psychology of money is also counterproductive in this, because brain scientists found, if humans center to much around money or the idea of money they tend to become reckless egoistic asholes.

But if women even encourage men to become asholes than we got:

moneysystem says: you should become an ashole

+

women say: you should become an ashole

= planet full of chaos & destruction by asholes

so why is it, that an expensive big car is STILL for (stupid) women enough “positive signal” to marry someone?

Even when it turns out expensive big cars can only be bought (not by hard fair labor) but also by:

  1. drug trafficking
  2. prostitution
  3. corruption

So capitalism is pretty clever in tricking the program nature installed on women.

A direct result of this, is the enormous amount of

  1. singles unable to find a suitable mate
  2. women pick “the wrong guy” (the asholes) thus actively encouraging more men to become asholes
  3. unlike 100 years ago (almost 100% of couples marry) to the year 2020 (almost 0% of couples marry) to almost 0% of couples want to have kids (breed more asholes)

Solutions for the dilemma please?

So the task for men and women (mankind) is to come up with a financial economic system that incentives positive human traits.

If parents do not care about the probability of survival of their kids – needless to say, the survival of mankind is at stake (exactly NOT what nature wanted).

to Women:

  1. ignore the Porsche
  2. build and train awareness what, REALLY makes a good mate fit for family & survival of the family and mankind (and even if that dude never will drive a Porsche, stick with it)
  3. if women fail to encourage men to become good humans (anything but psychopathic asholes) mankind is f***ed

simple truths can be very powerful and we consider them to be self evident…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_H%C3%BCther
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Hüther

“Latest discovery of brain research shows, quiet  stunning facts about “what is the brain”.

Our brain is not solely defined by genes.

You can also not train it like a muscle.

It is way simpler.

Our brain becomes for whatever we use it for with enthusiasm.”

auto translated from blurb of this book: https://www.amazon.de/Was-sind-sein-k%C3%B6nnten-neurobiologischer/dp/3100324056

Humans ain’t perfect, thus all human made systems will contain errors, thus all (man made) governmental systems are flawed and are in need of constant improvement.

Bismarck had a distinct distrust in democracy and favored monarchy.

But show me a good king?

There have been so many bad kings.

Because power corrupts, absolute power seems to corrupt even more.

So monarchy ain’t perfect, Democracy ain’t perfect, what will come next?

The next step for democracy can not be to go back to monarchy.

But to reinvent democracy in a positive (for everybody), creative, productive, fair, just and job creating way.

New forms of democracy need to be locally tested, and yes, maybe some countries are “too big” for democracy to function properly, then test new forms of democracy on smaller community (local) levels.

Whatever comes after democracy, the goal of every form of government, should be, to create a decision making process of maximum competence.

This is exactly, what (corrupted money driven) democracies (currently) fail at, they fail at making competent decisions for the good of all.